Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Relationship between mandibular condyle and angle fractures and the presence of mandibular third molars

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2015³â 41±Ç 1È£ p.3 ~ 10
¸¶µæÇö, ±è¼ö°ü, ¹®¼º¿ë, ¿ÀÁö¼ö, À¯Àç½Ä,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¸¶µæÇö ( Mah Deuk-Hyun ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è¼ö°ü ( Kim Su-Gwan ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¹®¼º¿ë ( Moon Seong-Yong ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¿ÀÁö¼ö ( Oh Ji-Su ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
À¯Àç½Ä ( You Jae-Seek ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Objectives: We retrospectively evaluated the impact of mandibular third molars on the occurrence of angle and condyle fractures.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective investigation using patient records and radiographs. The sample set consisted of 440 patients with mandibular fractures. Eruption space, depth and angulation of the third molar were measured.

Results: Of the 144 angle fracture patients, 130 patients had third molars and 14 patients did not. The ratio of angle fractures when a third molar was present (1.26 : 1) was greater than when no third molar was present (0.19 : 1; odds ratio, 6.58; P<0.001). Of the 141 condyle fractures patients, the third molar was present in 84 patients and absent in 57 patients. The ratio of condyle fractures when a third molar was present (0.56 : 1) was lower than when no third molar was present (1.90 : 1; odds ratio, 0.30; P<0.001).

Conclusion: The increased ratio of angle fractures with third molars and the ratio of condyle fractures without a third molar were statistically signif-cant. The occurrence of angle and condyle fractures was more affected by the continuity of the cortical bone at the angle than by the depth of a third molar. These results demonstrate that a third molar can be a determining factor in angle and condyle fractures.

Å°¿öµå

Bone fracture; Trauma; Tooth

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed